Most teachers want to assess the skills that actually matter.
Not just recognition. Not just “pick the right answer.” Real communication.
The hard part is not deciding what to assess. The hard part is grading it.
Speaking and writing assessments can create a grading backlog quickly. One assignment can turn into hours of listening and reading, plus the pressure to score consistently and leave helpful feedback.
Speakable Assessments are designed to make this easier to manage, especially with larger classes, by combining rubric-based scoring with auto-grading for open responses.
Rubrics are one of the few tools that solve multiple problems at once.
They help you:
But rubrics only work if they’re easy to use.
If a rubric takes too long to build, or if you have to recreate it every time, it becomes one more thing you meant to do but never had time for.
The advantage of rubric-based assessments in Speakable is that the rubric becomes reusable, and scoring can happen automatically against the criteria you defined.
Authentic assessments usually involve open responses. That’s where students show their real ability.
These are the assessments teachers trust. They are also the ones that are hardest to grade.
Even when you keep responses short, a full set of submissions can take hours, and that’s before you factor in consistency.
When you’re tired, it’s harder to be consistent. When you’re rushed, feedback gets shorter. And when you know the grading load is coming, it’s tempting to assign fewer open responses in the first place.
That’s the cycle most teachers want to escape.
Speakable assessments are designed for the moment when you want students to demonstrate mastery, but you also need the workflow to be sustainable.
You can still build assessments that feel authentic and engaging, including:
But instead of grading everything manually, you can rely on rubric-based auto-grading for open responses.
The practical outcome is simple:
You can assess speaking and writing more often, without trading your time for it.
Auto-grading is what makes open-response assessment sustainable.
But teachers also need confidence that the grade is fair and the feedback is appropriate.
That’s why Speakable keeps teachers in control of the final outcome.
After grading is generated, teachers can review student work, adjust scores, and send results back when they’re ready.
This means you can:
Assessment is different from practice.
During assessments, students should not be learning the answers in real time.
In Speakable, scores and feedback can be generated automatically, but students don’t see them until you review and release them.
That protects the integrity of the assessment while still giving you the speed benefits of auto-grading.
Classroom reality is messy.
Students arrive late. Fire drills happen. Devices die. A group needs a retake window.
Speakable gives teachers control over assessment access so you can open and close the assessment as needed.
This lets you run assessments in a way that fits real classroom pacing, not an idealized schedule.
For schools that need stronger integrity controls, Speakable supports browser lock during assessments.
This helps reduce the temptation to switch tabs during assessment time and adds a layer of accountability when it matters.
Many teachers want assessment results to map to something more meaningful than points.
Speakable can estimate student proficiency levels based on the standard you prefer, like ACTFL, WIDA, or CEFR.
This helps you understand not just how many points a student earned, but what that performance indicates about their progress toward proficiency.
When students submit open responses, grammar markups can be generated automatically as part of the feedback package.
This is especially valuable for writing and short answer assessments, where manual grammar annotations can take a significant amount of time.
When you’re reviewing an assessment set, you don’t want to open every response at full depth first.
You want an overview.
Speakable can provide an AI summary of a student’s work so you can quickly understand:
That helps teachers review faster without sacrificing insight.
Here are three assessment templates that teachers can run repeatedly without reinventing the wheel.
Students watch or listen, then explain what happened and justify an interpretation.
Great for assessing:
Prompt example:
“Summarize what happened. Then explain why you think the speaker felt that way. Use one detail as evidence.”
Students write a paragraph with a specific structure.
Great for assessing:
Prompt example:
“Write 6–8 sentences describing the problem and your recommendation. Use at least two connectors.”
Students read a short passage, then respond orally using details from the text.
Great for assessing:
Prompt example:
“Explain the author’s main point, then give your opinion and use one quote or detail from the text.”
Teachers already know open responses are the best way to assess language.
The challenge has always been time and consistency.
Rubric-based auto-grading changes what’s realistic.
It means you can:
And most importantly, it means you can assess the skills you actually care about, without sacrificing your evenings to do it.
.svg)
